ECS Co-Authors Response to Executive Order “Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking”

ECS co-authored a letter to Congressional leadership expressing concerns regarding the August 7 Executive Order (EO), Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking.”  The letter was signed by more than 60 scientific societies. 

“ECS is a non-partisan, non-political organization,” said Christopher Jannuzzi, ECS Executive Director & CEO. “However, we recognize the right and responsibility to engage when legislative or regulatory actions directly impact our mission, operations, or the communities we serve. Recent US legislation has raised significant concerns in our community and is negatively affecting our members. This letter exemplifies ECS’s commitment to upholding its mission and advocating responsibly on behalf of our members and the broader technical community.”

Key concerns

The letter urges Congress to exercise its oversight authority to prevent the politicization of scientific and medical research funding—long recognized as the gold standard for supporting groundbreaking discoveries and driving technological innovation worldwide. It also calls on Congress to provide clear guidance to federal agencies as they implement the EO.

  • Political Appointees [Sec. 3(a)(vii)(c): Congress is asked to ensure that independent peer review remains the cornerstone of the federal scientific grantmaking process so that the most meritorious research continues to be funded under this and all future administrations.

  • Termination of Grants for Convenience [Sec. 6(a)(i)]: Congress is urged to safeguard the integrity of federal research funding by directing science agencies not to alter grant terms and conditions to allow termination for convenience, thereby protecting research from short-term political pressures.

  • Repeat Grant Recipients [Sec. 4(b)(iv)]: Congress is encouraged to collaborate with the scientific community, including the National Science Board, to review current practices and develop measures that ensure a diverse and balanced portfolio of grant recipients.

The letter concludes that the EO adds inefficiencies to the grant process and that Congress must stop the Administration’s proposal to prioritize research proposals from academic institutions with the lowest indirect (Facilities & Administration) cost rates.

Letter recipients

The letter was sent in September to:

  • Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House, U.S. House of Representatives
  • Hakeem Jeffries, House Minority Leader, U.S. House of Representatives
  • John Thune, Senate Majority Leader, U.S. Senate
  • Charles Schumer, Senate Minority Leader, U.S. Senate

Read more here.

For more information on ECS advocacy, go to https://www.electrochem.org/science-advocacy.

DISCLAIMER

All content provided in the ECS blog is for informational purposes only. The opinions and interests expressed here do not necessarily represent ECS's positions or views. ECS makes no representation or warranties about this blog or the accuracy or reliability of the blog. In addition, a link to an outside blog or website does not mean that ECS endorses that blog or website or has responsibility for its content or use.

ECS
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.